Lights Out in Sao Paulo!

Sao Paulo, Brazil will be a lot less cluttered beginning on January 1, 2007. Amazingly, the city has passed a law that will ban all “visual pollution.” This means there will be no billboards, electronic signs or even fliers! Ad Age reports that “South America has no government regulation on its outdoor advertising, making a citywide ban in Sao Paulo all the easier to execute.” Although the article points to a number of communities in the United States that have strict advertising regulations (such as certain areas in Boston and the billboard-free highways of Vermont and Oregon), enacting laws to prevent the spread of outdoor advertising is easier said than done.

I read an article this week recently that made me think about all the advertising in New York City. Our crayon offices are located just a short walk up the avenue from Times Square where it seems to me there are more neon lights, advertising messages and visual stimulation per square inch than anywhere else in the world. There are so many flashing lights and visual messaging it’s hard to imagine that many of these billboards standout from one another. Who even really notices any of these messages?

Going to Times Square is like receiving a year’s supply of audio/visual junk mail in one day. It’s an incredible spectacle, but having been there thousands of times the only billboards that immediately come to mind are the Kodak sign and the Coca-Cola bottle. Certainly, I realize the major reason anyone goes to Times Square (especially the millions of tourists every year) besides the fine dining at Olive Garden or to visit the world’s largest T.G.I. Friday’s is to see all the lights and experience the frenzied advertising-filled atmosphere.

But would we really miss the advertisments if they were all outlawed?

times-square-no-ads.JPG

  • I noticed this article and thought exactly the same thing Chris. My first visit to NYC was last week and I've never been to a city with so much branding and visual pollution.

    A couple of interesting quotes from the article (especially when juxtaposed with reading Jaffe's book):

    From an Advertiser who cast the only dissenting vote against the Sao Paolo law:

    “I think this city is going to become a sadder, duller place, Advertising is both an art form and, when you’re in your car or alone on foot, a form of entertainment that helps relieve solitude and boredom.”

    And a quote from a random consumer:

    “The truth is that there are so many banners, billboards, placards, signs and posters all over the place that they’ve lost their impact, and I hardly pay attention to them anymore. So what’s the point in the manufacturer of a product paying for advertising if all it is going to do is block my view and irritate me?”

    Look at those two quotes, which one is based in reality?
blog comments powered by Disqus